Shipbuilding - refund guarantees or conditional money back guarantees?



The object of a refund guarantee in shipbuilding is to ensure that Buyer can get their money back (usually from a bank) in the event that the shipbuilding contract is rightfully cancelled by Buyer. However, this assurance at best is tentative as the right to the money is not absolute.

Recent examples in shipbuilding cases where call on refund guarantees failed include invalid demand (Sea-Cargo Skips As v State Bank of India [2013] EWHC 177) and lack of authority (actual, ostensible or by ratification) to sign refund guarantees on the bank’s behalf (Sea Emerald SA v Prominvestbank).

In Sea-Cargo Skips As v State Bank of India, a demand on the refund guarantee issued in connection with a Shipbuilding Contract was held to be deficient. The guarantee required a statement from the Buyer that:

“(A) that the vessel or the construction thereof is delayed with more than 270 days as set out in the contract article IV 1 (E) which entitles the buyer to cancel the contract and to receive repayment of the advance payments,

(B) that you the buyer have pursuant to such right of cancellation duly cancelled the contract…….”

The Bank says that the demand failed to make reference to a delay within article IV 1 (e) of the Shipbuilding Contract and also failed to state that the Buyer was entitled to receive repayment of the advance payments.

The Judge agreed and stated that whether the demand was sufficient to trigger the bank’s liability to pay was a question of construction, i.e. what did the parties intend would trigger the Bank’s liability to pay. The relevant question is whether the demand complied with the refund guarantee and therefore bound the Bank to pay. He held that the demand was ambiguous and in the present case did not contain a statement that there had been 270 days delay as set out in article IV 1(e). Also, the Buyer did not state that he is entitled to repayment.

Comment:
Refund guarantees are sophisticated conditional money back guarantees, in view of the technicalities, please handle with care. Call in the professionals.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Letter of Intent

Updated 12 April 2022 A letter of intent (LOI), also called term sheet, expression or indication of interest in the commercial sectors is an informal offer or recap of the parties’ position on how they would proceed on a business proposal or venture. In the shipbuilding and offshore industry, where discussions on technical, commercial and legal matters leading up to a formal contract are complex and lengthy, letters of intent (LOIs) will often be used as prelude to the formation of a formal contract. Thus, LOIs will be used:   ·        Where the scope of work has been identified, but there are still outstanding items like selection of main engine suppliers, financing, guarantees, and board approvals that need to be finalised.   ·        At other times, LOI may be signed on condition that the parties will enter into a shipbuilding contract after the buyer’s bid for a shipbuilding project is successful, or where the parties intend to bid for a project jointly. (The intent of such
Read more

Letter of intent revisit

A letter of intent (LOI), also called a term sheet, expression, or indication of interest in the commercial sectors is an informal offer or recap of the parties’ position on how they would proceed on a business proposal or venture. In the shipbuilding and offshore industry, where discussions on technical, commercial, and legal matters leading up to a formal contract are complex and lengthy, letters of intent (LOIs) will often be used as the prelude to the formation of a formal contract. Thus, LOIs will be used:   ·         Where the scope of work has been identified, but there are still outstanding items like the selection of main engine suppliers, financing, guarantees, and board approvals that need to be finalized.   ·         At other times, LOI may be signed on condition that the parties will enter into a shipbuilding contract after the buyer’s bid for a shipbuilding project is successful, or where the parties intend to bid for a project jointly. (The intent of such LOIs is to secu
Read more

Shipbuilding Guarantees: Anti-Discharge Provisions and the Purview Doctrine

Image
  In shipbuilding contracts there will inevitably be variations to the specification, plans, drawings, delivery date, and the contract price.   Whether such variations can discharge the guarantor’s obligation under related payment or refund guarantees will depend on whether such guarantees are a traditional or a demand guarantee. With regard to traditional guarantee, it was held in Holme v Brunskill   [1] , that any material variation of the underlying contract without the surety’s consent will discharge the surety from liability under the guarantee, except where it is self-evident that the alteration is insubstantial or beneficial to the surety. This is also because the liability of the debtor and surety under a traditional guarantee are co-extensive. In contrast, the rule will not apply to a demand guarantee, which is payable without proof or condition, independent of the underlying contract and can simply be activated by a demand made on the bank. To circumvent the rule in Holme v
Read more